Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It massively disadvantages the company. Why pay for software to be built that can just be taken by your software engineers, who form a new company and run a competing product?


Well if that were the situation for all companies, the answer to why pay is the same as it is now - even if it doesn't provide so much of a moat, they have a business need for certain code so they pay in order to have and run that code.

(I'm not sure if it would be better or worse myself, I suspect it might not make much of a difference when everything balances out.)


Because that won't happen unless you massively mismanage the company. The coordination problem between the company employees is very hard to solve.


Why not? Why as a developer wouldn't I go to a VC and say "I have the source and rights to this premade product - fancy giving me some cash to take my team and run it?"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: