I think this is a glass-half-full view o TOML, when TOML itself was the one that added water to the glass to begin with.
The main value proposition of TOML is to provide a concrete specification of a INI-type config language. INI is ubiquitous, but it lacked a spec, which led to a lot of wheels being reinvented. TOML fixed that.
If a project needs convoluted config files, I'd argue the project is already broken. If TOML doesn't fit your needs, that's hardly TOML's fault.
The main value proposition of TOML is to provide a concrete specification of a INI-type config language. INI is ubiquitous, but it lacked a spec, which led to a lot of wheels being reinvented. TOML fixed that.
If a project needs convoluted config files, I'd argue the project is already broken. If TOML doesn't fit your needs, that's hardly TOML's fault.