I agree with you, here's an expanded version of the buckets I think exist:
1. I'm genuine but I haven't thought this through
2. I'm genuine and I have thought this through (regardless if I'm right or wrong)
3. I'm adversarial and weaponise my opinion in order to advance some other agenda or push the overton window
My proposition is that if you assume everyone is in bucket 1, you never rethink your opinions and just think "poorly" of others which doesn't allow you to advance your thinking as fast as if you classify them as bucket 2. For people in bucket 3, you just have to trust that you'll spot a bad actor from their actions and inconsistent rhetoric over time so that you're not fooled over the long run. But similarly to people that choose to never find love for fear of having their heart broken, I wouldn't want to assume everyone is in bucket 3 because that's a shitty life to live.
1. I'm genuine but I haven't thought this through
2. I'm genuine and I have thought this through (regardless if I'm right or wrong)
3. I'm adversarial and weaponise my opinion in order to advance some other agenda or push the overton window
My proposition is that if you assume everyone is in bucket 1, you never rethink your opinions and just think "poorly" of others which doesn't allow you to advance your thinking as fast as if you classify them as bucket 2. For people in bucket 3, you just have to trust that you'll spot a bad actor from their actions and inconsistent rhetoric over time so that you're not fooled over the long run. But similarly to people that choose to never find love for fear of having their heart broken, I wouldn't want to assume everyone is in bucket 3 because that's a shitty life to live.