I’m not sure there is anything wrong with having an opinion it’s just a lot of the time any post related to economics/history/other non tech subjects is full of overconfident people offering semi-absurd solutions (some of which have even been tried but they are obviously not aware of that).
> Private legal system with non-profit counsel. Would be interesting to try it again, but no state would ever revert that kind of power to its citizens.
"Over-confident"
"solution"
This is just too much, it's satire right? Really good if it is. Nothing more fragile and angry than an "expert" who has their proclamations challenged, or an indoctrinated follower who is threatened with scary opinions.
The Roman legal system was extremely arbitrary and highly dysfunctional by modern standard. Why transporting some random feature of it (which contributed to it being such) to the modern world would ever be a good idea?
> revert that kind of power to its citizens.
It think it’s the inverse and would significantly decrease the “power” a random person has due to obvious reasons.
> fragile and angry
I’m neither angry or fragile. Why would you even use these words? I just shared my observation, that’s it.
> indoctrinated
That generally comments which include this word tend to be at least mildly deranged is another thing I noticed here as well.
I'm sorry you're so angry you're resorting to not addressing my comments and doing the "I know you are but what am I" shtick, while still being incapable of pointing out this fanciful "over-confident solution" you had somehow dreamed up. Maybe it's time to stop thinking about things that scare you so much if this is how you react.
What's more tiresome is people spouting rambling and incoherent "critiques" of others which they are incapable of substantiating due to their dishonesty and/or other mental deficiencies.
But just to clarify a bit: I’m not “backing down” from anything I said.
Unfortunately it’s just hard tell what exactly I’m supposed to substantiate because your diatribes are a bit too incoherent.. and it’s quite hard to comprehend what are you trying to say.
I would advise you to tone do the amount of “personal” insults when trying to communicate with other people.
They really obscure your actual points (assuming they exist?) and they they aren’t doing much anyway since I still can’t really tell whether you’re talking to me or somebody else.
Also I generally find that insults are most effective when used sparingly or in a subtle backhanded manner.
