Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah I would say "in one round, the collective wealth goes up 5% in expectation" but "for a finite population and starting wealth, the collective wealth will tend to 0 given enough rounds" not almost, but absolutely.


Maybe you're not aware but almost surely is a technical term - which makes the statement correct.

Just like you cannot be absolutely certain to get heads if you flip a coin enough times even though it will happen almost surely.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: