> how come famines were a thing then if this is so easy?
What infomation do you have on pre European landing famine in Australia?
> my guess is that you probably picked a particular sparsely living group
The Swan Valley quote above applied to Western Australian and Central Desert groups prior to being shunted off traditional lands by European settlement (an area comfortably three times larger than Texas) - it continues to apply in areas where traditional practices on traditional lands continue.
> time & effort humans had to spend on simply acquiring enough calories
so you are reducing "humans" in the comment you are replying to, to Western Australian and Central Desert groups? that's not the majority of humans, who really did have to fight for calories
What infomation do you have on pre European landing famine in Australia?
> my guess is that you probably picked a particular sparsely living group
The Swan Valley quote above applied to Western Australian and Central Desert groups prior to being shunted off traditional lands by European settlement (an area comfortably three times larger than Texas) - it continues to apply in areas where traditional practices on traditional lands continue.
https://mgnsw.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/map_col_high...
> that eventually probably got wiped out by a hungrier group.
Recent genetics has confirmed what was also the local oral history, that people arrived, fanned out, and stayed where they first settled:
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature21416
This runs contrary to the views espoused for decades by Windshuttle in Quadrant.
> furthermore, hunting for three hours no freaking way can sustain population density of say Indonesia
?? Pre Dutch contact Indonesia ?
I specifically linked to the example of Australian hunter gathers.
You can take it that my earlier comment doesn't apply to Iñupiat, Yupik, Aleut, Eyak, Tlingit, Haida, Tsimshian, etc peoples of Alaska.