Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> He’s trying to make Twitter able to pay its own bills.

He could've bought seats on the board to accomplish this through standard shareholder activism. By committing a leveraged buyout and saddling the company with an additional >1 billion a year in added debt payments, while simultaneously driving advertising revenue into the ground, he's basically sent the company on a beeline toward insolvency.



I didn’t say he did anything right.

I’m just saying his goals and his poor ability to achieve them.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: