f I use second most. It has so many uses all of which could be done with / command, but definitely you come to prefer f. I use f( to scan forward to the next open paren. Then I use di( to delete in parens for example to remove the arguments. Uppercase F does the same but backward up the text. Often I use f, to go to a comma. df, to delete up to the next comma as in removing just 1 argument. The only draw back is that f does not have any repeat shortcut like n for next or . for reapply, those do nothing for f. I should mention also that f works on a single line at a time unlike /
> The only draw back is that f does not have any repeat shortcut like n for next or . for reapply, those do nothing for f.
Boy, do I have news for you :) ; will repeat an f/t/F/T motion forwards, and , will move back. Having it separate from n/N means that they have a separate history and you can combine them to repeat motions.
Also, if you’re not bound to using Vim without plugins, then the CleverF plugin lets you repeat with f/F instead of ;/,
It’s IMO easier to hit f again than to reach for the semicolon, and moreover this frees ; and , for usage in your own mappings (e.g. leader and localleader)
After this I am going to try to work in f to my routine.
The only issue is (content warning: controversial remap) I have ; nnoremap'd to : and : to ; so it would be awkward to advance multiple matches. I would hate to lose my one key :, but perhaps there is a workaround if f is useful enough (for those unfamiliar, with / or ? you use n to go to the next match).
I specifically avoided making that ; and : swap for decades as tempting as it has always been. Repeating with ; is just too useful.
However, I'm using Doom Emacs these days (with evil, of course) and while it emulates vim's command mode with colon, it's designed to drive most "commands" with space as a sort of leader key. I could imagine space being a nice remap for : in vanilla vim since it does nothing in normal mode.
I use both vim and doom-emacs almost daily and jump between the two. I like using <spacebar> to call command mode in vim to do things like :tabe or :bd or
:ls etc. (I have <leader> set to , ). I have this remap in my .vimrc > cmap w<space> :w<cr>. This allows <space>w<space> to write the buffer. The second
space acts as <cr> meaning I don't need to press <enter>. Lovely.
Now, turning to doom-emacs, SPACE is the modal for getting the list of next available commands. To save a buffer in doom-emacs I use SPACE w SPACE. Et
voila, the same muscle memory works for both. BTW I also set up :ww to write/quit so SPACE W W does this in both editors. Well, it works for me!
That sounds great! It actually only dawned on me that I could have a setup like you describe as I was writing my comment above. Thanks for sharing your details!
The only downside for me, and I've been reluctant about this for years, is I ssh into a lot of Linux machines that usually just have the standard stuff and default configs. This has kept me from experimenting with a lot things so as to keep my muscle memory also standard (thus avoiding i.e.: zsh, extensive .vimrc with plugins, etc).
Isn't dt, to delete up until and df, to include. I'm guess either you have config or it's so ingrained in muscle memory that there is a mismatch between what you type and what you think it is.
When I played piano there was a point where I could play a piece without thought but couldn't parse the sheet music or know what my fingers were doing anymore.
