Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Election structure

Elections are always-ongoing affairs, they never stop.

This seems absolutely, horrifically, terrible. Under such a system, no leader will ever lead, instead, a leader will grandstand constantly. You'll end up with moderators that spend all day, every day, playing a popularity contest.



Why do you need a "leader that leads" for a subreddit?

As for grandstanding, that may well be the case if that's what the membership wants - in which case I would argue that it is precisely what they should get. But also, does it really matter if you can just opt out from moderators you don't like?


> Under such a system, no leader will ever lead

That's the whole point. It elects spokespersons, not leaders. It's a wonderful idea.


It's terrible. Peer pressure, eg popularity contests, are the cause of most of this world's ills!


Do you realize that on the Internet people can move to a different community if they don't like the BDFL-style mods?

Besides, you are precisely claiming that dictatorships are better than democracies.


Read carefully. I said no such thing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: