Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It goes both ways, does it not? Companies and their respective goods or service can't survive without being profitable.


Amazon survived just fine without being profitable for something like two decades.


I feel like we would all have been better off if Amazon had not been allowed to do this.


I absolutely agree.


Investors are willing to put a premium on growth, even if it means the company is unprofitable (for certain definitions of unprofitable — you have to be convincing that you could be profitable, if only you stopped spending so much on growth). If you're unprofitable and losing users you're in trouble.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: