Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> this was a test, they didn't have anything left to test except for a flight. delaying would be pointless, everything else had already been tested.

Apparently not, since:

1) the launch site was damaged

2) several engines did not work

3) the RUD

I'd say, there's plenty that they could have tested before launching.



Keep in mind that the B7 and S24 were both obsolete designs. B7 had previous gen Raptor engines, with next gen being (presumably) simpler design and more reliable; it had hydraulics-driven mechanism to gimbal the engines (the next gen has electric motors); and the engines had less isolation/protection against RUD of neighboring engines than B9 and above. I'm less familiar with S24 but do know that its design is obsolete to a great degree as well. So realistically they both could have been sent to scraps, or launched just to get some initial testing done. The only thing I think SpaceX could have done better was the launch pad design (flame diverter and water deluge), and I think it was pretty clear after the static fire that it was completely necessary.

SpaceX took a risk, with the worst case scenario being launch pad and ground infrastructure being blown up to shreds, which did no happen. I agree that everything else was just icing on the cake. So I would put that to the W.


My understanding is that the engine on the B7 aren’t really powerful enough, so if a few go out, then the rest are just “fighting gravity” and not really accelerating the ship.

The new engines should have more net acceleration and should therefore tolerate a few engines failing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: