Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's striking how on AGI, the common opinion here on HN is the complete opposite to the one in the AI alignment field. There, people are angry with OpenAI for being too open, here people are angry with it not being open enough. For example, Eliezer Yudkowsky:

> Ryan: OpenAI [...] It's kind of a completely open-source AI project?

> Eliezer: That was the original suicidal vision, yes. But...

> Ryan: And now they're bent on commercializing the technology, is that right?

> Eliezer: That's an improvement, but not enough of one, because they're still generating lots of noise and hype and directing more resources into the field, and storming ahead with the safety that they have instead of the safety that they need, and setting bad examples.

> [...] I would change the name to "ClosedAI". Because right now, they're making it look like being "closed" is hypocrisy. They're, like, being "closed" while keeping the name "OpenAI", and that itself makes it looks like closure is like not this thing that you do cooperatively so that humanity will not die, but instead this sleazy profit-making thing that you do while keeping the name “OpenAI”.

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/e4pYaNt89mottpkWZ/yudkowsky-...



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: