Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

[flagged]


Probably because it happened to a village of 200 people in the relative middle of nowhere.

Remember the Flint water crisis? That was a population-dense city, with multiple school districts all being poisoned by lead and legionnaires disease. Nobody cared about it until it was turned into a political negligence story, then it was all you could see on Fox and CNN...

People just don't really care about this stuff. It's novel from a social media perspective (black plume of smoke occludes forested midwestern town!) but it's not like the media has any shortage of humanitarian crises to report on.


It's 2,000 people in the town itself and 20,000 within a 10 mile radius.

We're quite lucky this did not happen in Pittsburgh or Columbus.


And Flint's water empties into all 5 lakes. Still not worth talking about polluting the world's largest freshwater body until we can throw darts at a talking head though!


The amount of basin-wide city waste and industrial waste that ends up there dwarfs the stuff you're getting from Flint.


No, I disagree. Flint was a disaster because it went for years without being addressed - if this has a cleanup process starting less than a week after it happens, it's already being handled better.


Hey, 0 people live in the water so it's fine if the oceans get poisoned, right?


To be fair, Greta is a teenager who happens to live in Europe.


Granted, but she seems to be invested in our environmental causes and had opinions on the XL pipeline, among other things.


One political side seems to think she's the spokesperson for the other political side.


Does she pick and choose what environmental causes are worthy of her attention?


No idea. Why do you think anyone here would have a deep understanding of how she operates?


Perhaps they meant Greta Van Susteren.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: