I don't know if you meant to, but all three of those links are hilarious if you read them. The first one has `moving toward` in the title, which is academic speak for "it doesn't work and we don't know how to make it work". Otherwise it would be arrived at. Very similar to Betteridge's Law of Headlines for academia.
The second link is a news article that is very critical about the motivations, projected success, and sneaky language used by companies to justify pyrolisys. And this is coming from what is ostensibly a pro-chemical news source.
The third article is paywalled and I'm guessing 99% of us can't read it. However, the `Opportunities and Challenges` is again academic talk for "we looked into it and it's really really hard".
I found this link while searching the DOI of the third article. Sci-Hub seems to be a site that lets you access all sorts of scientific papers, because they believe everyone rich or poor should have free access to science. It was created by Alexandra Elbakyan, a modern day Robin Hood.
Or so they say, I'd never endorse you reading the paper without giving more money to the multi-billion dollar private publisher Elsevier.
The second link is a news article that is very critical about the motivations, projected success, and sneaky language used by companies to justify pyrolisys. And this is coming from what is ostensibly a pro-chemical news source.
The third article is paywalled and I'm guessing 99% of us can't read it. However, the `Opportunities and Challenges` is again academic talk for "we looked into it and it's really really hard".