> Rust is licensed under terms that require explicit permission for use outside of a few very narrowly-defined circumstances.
I think you mean the Rust trademark, and sorry, but you don't get to use IBM or Google's mark willy-nilly either? I'm not sure it's a realistic expectation on your part to be able to market your changes under the other guy's mark.
Rust is not MIT/Apache-licensed, rustc is.
Rust is licensed under terms that require explicit permission for use outside of a few very narrowly-defined circumstances.