Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The Finnish case markers are not clitics. Clitics are distinguished in that they modify phrases, not words. For example the English possessive “‘s” is a clitic because it can modify a whole phrase in something like “[the Queen of England]’s hat” although it cannot appear as a word on its own. In contrast, the Finnish case markers are bound phonologically and syntactically to a single word and so they are affixes, not clitics.


> The Finnish case markers are not clitics. Clitics are distinguished in that they modify phrases, not words.

Except that this is a claim you just made up, which is not reflected in any usage of the term.

SIL ( https://glossary.sil.org/term/clitic-grammar ):

> A clitic is a morpheme that has syntactic characteristics of a word, but shows evidence of being phonologically bound to another word.

Wikipedia ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitic ):

> a clitic [] is a morpheme that has syntactic characteristics of a word, but depends phonologically on another word or phrase.

The English 'genitive' particle 's is a clitic[1] because it takes its pronunciation from the syllable it follows. Not because it has grammatical functions at a phrase level. Clitic 'm can only ever follow the pronoun I, but that does nothing to stop it from being clitic.

[1] Actually, CGEL prefers to call 's a "phrasal case marker", but I find that absurd.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: