Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is actually fascinating. T-Mobile doesn’t need a fiber or even cable buildout to a remote location, just power and the local clearances for a tower, they plop a Starlink antenna on the top and bam. Congestion will be a challenge but it will be way better than the current status quo.


This needs no new towers, direct cell / sat comms with current phones


Won't that require a bunch of phone hardware for sat comms?


Not if they use the regular frequencies. It'll require a pretty sensitive receiver though, no point in steering the beam if you don't know where the recipient is.


They are using standard 5G midband spectrum from T-mobile


The claim is it won't.


I don't think congestion will be too bad. If you have too much congestion for starlink, you probably have enough traffic to make a tower make sense.


No I think you're misunderstanding the service. No towers involved, this is beaming direct from space to cell phones.


That isn't what this is, but they did mention maybe partnering for backhaul in the future (likely with similar tech and frequencies to the home internet, not the frequencies in this announcement).


>Congestion will be a challenge but it will be way better than the current status quo.

If they QoS common messaging apps and SMS, it'll be a massive win for a lot of people.


As others have pointed out, this isn't that. But you bring up an interesting possibility for the progression of this partnership.


Once they discover the "bird to handset" thing doesn't actually work.


No, this needs no new towers or hardware




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: