I have no dog in this race, it's between Musk and Twitter.
Both sides have their arguments, I couldn't care less which side "wins".
The only thing I wanted to point out is that the best case is clearly Musk walking away without paying $1B. That's why this is going to court, a B represents a lot of zeroes for lawyers to at least get a taste of fighting over.
I don't care either way. I don't like Twitter and I certainly don't like Musk either.
But given what I know about the subject, there's an "obvious" element of justice, who is right or wrong in this situation. Given everything Musk has said, and comparing it against what Twitter has said, I'm inclined to believe Twitter's argument over Musk's so far.
Maybe Musk is holding back his best arguments for court, which is a possible strategy. But everything he's revealed thus far is... pretty bad? Like, poop-emoji bad.
I presume that's what this discussion is about after all? Evaluating the arguments the two sides have brought forth so far? Why else would we be talking about this subject? I mean, both sides are pretty much tweeting their arguments into the public sphere. We certainly have enough to discuss on the subject already (IE: Whether there's elements to disbelieve in Twitter's statements so far, or vice versa for Musk's statements).
Both sides have their arguments, I couldn't care less which side "wins".
The only thing I wanted to point out is that the best case is clearly Musk walking away without paying $1B. That's why this is going to court, a B represents a lot of zeroes for lawyers to at least get a taste of fighting over.