here is a hearing for a person who has been incarcerated for 4 years and no charges have been filed against him. the court granted him bail but it only took the court 4 years to do so.
edit: that said, it is simply not a question of increasing the number of courts because apparently it costs milions and millions to set up a single courtroom.
things have definitely improved in the last decades as arbitration is given preference, there is things like "lok adalats" where small cases are heard in a quick succession so that case loads are reduced.
Here are a couple of livestreams of high courts in india https://www.youtube.com/c/BlackGownlaw https://www.youtube.com/c/GujaratHighCourtLive/videos
you can easily find courts right now hearing cases from 20-30 years ago meaning all that time, the case has been delayed for some reason or the other.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-1qOtI9zv8
here is a hearing for a person who has been incarcerated for 4 years and no charges have been filed against him. the court granted him bail but it only took the court 4 years to do so.
edit: that said, it is simply not a question of increasing the number of courts because apparently it costs milions and millions to set up a single courtroom.
things have definitely improved in the last decades as arbitration is given preference, there is things like "lok adalats" where small cases are heard in a quick succession so that case loads are reduced.