That was a lifetime ago, and people still bring it up. All it demonstrates is that growth can go on for a bit. Can it actually go indefinitely? So far that we don't even need to care?

Ehrlich might have been way too early but still have something interesting to say.

Basically none of Ehrlich's predictions ever came true.

You might want to read up on their second wager. If they had taken that first wager 10 years ago, what do you think the result would be?

If you haven't, I would suggest "The Limits to Growth." I'm not arguing for "de-growth," but I think your fundamental assumption that we can innovate or Silicon Valley our way out of climate change without inadvertently sacrificing economic prosperity is too late and highly naive. https://www.amazon.com/Limits-Growth-Donella-H-Meadows/dp/19...