Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The same of course goes the other way, Big Ag definitely is able to put its hand on the Department of Ag. The report I referred to is from GAO, which is much more independent than USDA.

I couldn't find the GAO report I mentioned but I found a more recent one published this year by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, one of the more prestigious journals in the world. In their abstract in addition to mentioning US ethanol raised corn prices by 30% and other crop prices by 20% they say it

> ... caused enough domestic land use change emissions such that the carbon intensity of corn ethanol produced under the RFS is no less than gasoline and likely at least 24% higher.

Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard https://www.pnas.org/doi/suppl/10.1073/pnas.2101084119



That was a good link, it seems like replacing corn with an alternative crop really is the sensible direction.

There is something of note in the methodology behind the figures though:

“We apply our models only domestically”

Throughout the years of this study, the US imported most of its gasoline. The production emissions are excluded. It’s not comparing like with like.


> Throughout the years of this study, the US imported most of its gasoline.

Uhh what? We export more gasoline than we import.

https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_sum_snd_a_epm0f_mbblpd_a_cu...

Even if you meant crude oil and not gasoline you are still wrong, we recently became a net oil exporter.


>> Uhh what? We export more gasoline than we import.

The study data is from 2008 to 2016 right? The US was (massively) an importer of gasoline in that time period, right?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: