Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not sure how you read what you're suggesting into my description. I make a commit.

    git commit
    # ...
    git commit # or two
I push them to the staging area for a given branch, in this case master

    git push HEAD:refs/for/master
This isn't a branch in the traditional sense but git conveniently sees it that way.

Now they're immediately available for review. That looks something like this (this is not from my workplace, but the Go team's Gerrit instance): https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/361916

> Either way, just so you know, this kind of attitude and that you think it's a-ok to use such a convoluted process for what is effectively the same thing would 100% mean me not hiring you.

That's fine. There are plenty of companies that manage to hire based on competence, experience and references so I'm not exactly aching to get hired at a place that would deny me for having used Gerrit.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: