Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I know tee but have no idea what pee would do considering this description.

From your description I guess something like « pee a b » would be the same as « a | b »? If so that’s cool, but the one line descriptions definitely need a rework.



It loosely follows the same metaphor as the T-shaped pipe connector that 'tee' is named for.

    $ seq 3 | tee somefile
    1
    2
    3

            ╔═somefile
    seq═tee═╣    
            ╚═stdout


    $ seq 10 | pee 'head -n 3' 'tail -n 3'
    1
    2
    3
    8 
    9
    10


            ╔═head═╗
    seq═pee═╣      ╠═stdout
            ╚═tail═╝


I believe it's more like `a | pee b x y z | c`. This would run `b x y x` as well as `c` using the output from `a`.

I think Zsh supports this natively with its "multios" option, `a > >(b c y z) > >(c)`. But then you have to write the rest of your pipe inside the ().


I can only guess from that description is that it is the cat command.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: