Man I've completely lost track of whatever point you're even trying to make. I've gone back and read over it again, but you're just all over the place. I thought this conversation was about why Carter lost to Reagan. With regard to that topic, I think there is ample reason to believe a lot of people who voted for Carter the first time didn't vote for him the second time because they were thoroughly dissatisfied with his performance, and scant evidence that it was Reagan's racism that won over Carter voters. Reappraisals of Carter and Reagan years after the fact really aren't relevant.
Edit:
> he's linking to videos of racist skinheads to back up his baseless claims and beliefs
I clicked through to that video of "british skinhead". It's actually Tom Scott. Tom Scott certainly isn't a skinhead, recuter was clearly being sarcastic with that remark. He played you, I recommend you slow your roll and be lest hasty with your judgments.
No, I just said he wasn't arguing in good faith, and I was right, which you proved. You're actually the one he played into clicking on his misleadingly-described youtube video link. I already knew he didn't have a valid argument without falling for the bait and clicking on his "racist skinhead" link. Be glad he didn't slow your roll by rick-rolling you.
Edit:
> he's linking to videos of racist skinheads to back up his baseless claims and beliefs
I clicked through to that video of "british skinhead". It's actually Tom Scott. Tom Scott certainly isn't a skinhead, recuter was clearly being sarcastic with that remark. He played you, I recommend you slow your roll and be lest hasty with your judgments.