sometimes I like to read the first paragraph of articles with the opposite bias they impose.
> In the panicked spring of 2020, as health officials scrambled to keep communities safe, they recommended various restrictions and interventions, sometimes in the absence of rigorous science supporting them. That was understandable at the time.
becomes:
>In the spring of 2020, as more health professionals than ever before worked together on a single issue, they recommended measures and interventions, based on our most up-to-date understanding of medicine and science. That was remarkable at the time....
> In the panicked spring of 2020, as health officials scrambled to keep communities safe, they recommended various restrictions and interventions, sometimes in the absence of rigorous science supporting them. That was understandable at the time.
becomes:
>In the spring of 2020, as more health professionals than ever before worked together on a single issue, they recommended measures and interventions, based on our most up-to-date understanding of medicine and science. That was remarkable at the time....