Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's the sponsors' decision to make. As I said, I have no issue if Open Collective just cancels these sponsorships.

What I don't agree is to transfer its sponsors to an account that has zero relationship with original account.



> That's the sponsors' decision to make.

Marak's GitHub sponsors aren't changed. If people wanted to specifically sponsor Marak, they would have chosen to do it there. The Open Collective is very specifically about the project, not a specific person.

> What I don't agree is to transfer its sponsors to an account that has zero relationship with original account.

The current fakerjs has more of a relationships with the original code than what's in Marak's repo.

I don't see the issue. The Open Collective is specifically about sponsoring the project, which Marak clearly and publicly washed his hands of.

Again, they weren't sponsoring Marak. They were sponsoring the project. The project is still going.


Do you also have no issue if GitHub just transfers Marak's repo to the new team? Or all the stars? Since obviously most of people are starring the "project" not him.


Kinda pointless to argue about this because it didn't happen.


I'm trying to use analogy to show the ridiculousness of transferring followers (sponsors) around without agreement of two parties. Hell, I think it makes even less sense in OC's case since there is real money involved.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: