Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

GHB is a horrible alternative to alcohol. I really don't understand why you think that is not the case. GHB is highly addictive, dosing is hard, it's really unhealthy with long term use and is nearly impossible to stop doing once you're addicted.

In the Netherlands, the percentage of people that relapse after rehabilitating from GHB is the highest of all drugs, including alcohol.



> In the Netherlands, the percentage of people that relapse after rehabilitating from GHB is the highest of all drugs, including alcohol.

Humans love alcohol-like feelings, so the comparison is vis-a-vis against alcohol.

Alcohol relapse statistics are on a much higer sample given how widespread it is, whereas for G the sample is much smaller.

Also among the people who don't relapse are also included in those who die or have their bodies so screwed up that have no alternative but quitting if they want to keep living. Alcohol does that to a whole lot of people who technically don't relapse....but don't breath anymore either.

G doesn't cause any liver, heart, kidney, cardiac, valvular, stomach, arterial, testicular damage, so of course people will come back for more.

If the only negative effects are psychological then it's a testimony to the amazing proprieties of the substance.

Also in science the standard practice is that if you can't measure it then there is no point talking about it or even discussing it.

We don't know what happens inside our brains, the mechanisms of addiction and so forth.. we can only evaluate the effects.


>Humans love alcohol-like feelings, so the comparison is vis-a-vis against alcohol.

Some humans love the feeling of being in an inebriated state commonly brought on by the use of alcohol. The amount of people addicted to other drugs shows it is not just the drunkeness of alcohol people are after. However, the simple fact that alcohol is legal and readily available means that's the thing people use to achieve this inebriated state. Allow other substances to be legal and destigmatized the way alcohol has been, and you will see numbers change.


You have it the other way around.

Alcohol is legal because people love to be inebiated more than they like being stoned or on a paranoid coke binge, or nodding off due to heroin

Majority rules , and so the preference with regards to the feeling of being inebriated + collective risk tolerance of society + the variability of alcoholic beverages + the low cost of the substance made it so that alcohol emerged .


No, it's because primates have been eating rotten fruit for tens of thousands of years to get high, and primates can't run a chemistry lab.


> Alcohol relapse statistics are on a much higer sample given how widespread it is, whereas for G the sample is much smaller.

Does that imply we can never compare smaller data sets with larger ones? GHB is becoming a huge issue in the Netherlands to the point that there aren't enough rehab spots. So I would assume the amount of data is not insignificant and can therefore be compared.

> Alcohol does that to a whole lot of people who technically don't relapse....but don't breath anymore either.

So does GHB.

> G doesn't cause any liver, heart, kidney, cardiac, valvular, stomach, arterial, testicular damage, so of course people will come back for more.

You retort to my argument was that the data set for GHB was much smaller. How does that not matter with your argument?

Also, GHB is associated with cognitive changes and potential brain damage. So you might come back for more, but you won't be the same person:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/10/181008104628.h...

> Also in science the standard practice is that if you can't measure it then there is no point talking about it or even discussing it.

Which part can't you measure? You can measure relapse percentages. You can measure addiction rates. You can measure the length of an addiction. You can measure the physiological and metal impact of an addiction.

And it's not like nobody is doing that either.


> So does GHB.

No, the only way to die via GHB is to overdose on it. Alcohol instead sets you body on fire with inflammation and such inflammation attacks all tissues including vital ones which I mentioned and will repeat: heart, liver, kidneys, arteries, pancreas...

> You retort to my argument was that the data set for GHB was much smaller. How does that not matter with your argument?

Because we know that the cause for all that damage is inflammation, between alcohol and G only the former causes inflammation.

> Also, GHB is associated with cognitive changes and potential brain damage. So you might come back for more, but you won't be the same person:

Leave aside the brain, except for physical phenomenons such as blood, plaques, cancer....we really don't know what happens in there or why. We can't even predict our own thoughts 10 seconds from now..leave alone complex things such as cognition on a general scale and most importantly the ability to measure it.

Also let's assume we did know, say all that we know today is effectively what happens in the brain. Given that premise we also have to take for good the data that we have about the depression/anxiety epidemic, which is very widespread according to today's research.

Today research also tells us that prolonged anxiety/depression causes damage to the body, reduces cognition and IQ and trims years off a person's life.

Well, considering all the above...both alcohol and G seem a better alternative than becoming subject to the depression epidemic which causes both a reduction in quality of life, as well as a reduction in quantity of life. Alcohol is superior in terms of quality of life, unfortunately it also shortens quantity of life, but G has them both beaten because it prevents depression AND doesn't cause inflammation to tissues, so G is better for both quality and quantity of life.

Of course if you are a person who is naturally on cloud 9 all the time and essentially immune to the depression epidemic (meaning that you are essentially clueless about the world), then you are better off not taking anything.

But at that point you are also better off not leaving the house because leaving the house also has risks, and why would you take risks if you are essentially a buddha who is always on cloud 9 and perfectly happy and content the way things are and everything else is pushing on a string?

So even if we allowed for a perfect knowledge of our brains, if we take into consideration the median urban Western citizen who is always on the brink of depression then G is better than alcohol and all the other drugs used to solve depression, both prescribed (benzo, SSRIs...) and those used for self-medication purposes (alcohol, cocaine, MDMA, crack, weed..)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: