Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Re: agree on a layer of abstraction; the ur-problem^ of governance; abstracting the mechanisms with principles

Those can be important. I think in a modern context these will probably exist, because we're already familiar with charters, constitutions and such. They're probably quite necessary for dealing with disputes or property implications in a legally compatible way.

That said, I think considering these primary is probably a mistake, over extrapolating from the macropolitics we know.

The idea is not to design a decision making process. Let a process emerge, using our natural social abilities as people to to navigate it. Whatever emerges will probably be people dependant.

A designed system that works, has answers and resolutions for every eventuality and problem is a least common denominator system. You might have to default to this is you need governance for a random collection of people without a binding thread. But for any real community with solidarity, they likely make it work in a more organic way. It'll depend on the individuals and results will vary a lot between groups.

^What's an ur-problem?



The ur-problem is probably a reference to Goethe. In German 'ur' is a prefix that means primeval/original/ancient. So an ur-problem of governance is the original problem of governance.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: