Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not so worried about the fridge ratting me out. Cars on the other hand have lots of potential. Every traffic light could have a red light camera if it's the car watching and reporting.


In The Netherlands we had this problem with vehicle plate scanners. At first, they were strictly for vehicle tax purposes. Then later it came out they could be used by our three (well, four) letter agency in extraordinary circumstances. Then the police could request access in extreme cases, then less extreme, and now the ‘requesting access’ is nothing more than an automated process that is logged.

Build it and they will come.


Sounds like you’re describing an external device monitoring vehicle actions. The person you’re replying to is describing the vehicle monitoring and reporting its own actions.

In my opinion, people have proven themselves too irresponsible in cars (in a way that results in them regularly killing other people), and while I dislike surveillance, I am for the monitoring/reporting measures that are in some European countries.


He's describing an already existing slippery slope to warn against the slippery slope of putting surveillance in the cars themselves.


Driving is a privilege. Historically, the solution to irresponsible driving is to revoke that privilege.

Why should law abiding drivers be subjected to surveillance caused by the irresponsible crowd? Why is removing one’s driving privileges not enough?

Proactive monitoring/reporting is the stuff of slippery slopes and Minority Report is the direction we’re going at this point…


It’s because revoking privileges is not an effective means of getting these drivers off the road. It’s not a magic force field that prevents people from sitting behind the wheel. All you’re doing is taking a slip of paper away from people who have already demonstrated themselves to not only be irresponsible but also indifferent toward the law.

In fact, revoking driving privileges can be counter productive because it takes away their ability to be insured while driving.


If you want to treat driving as a privilege, then the city needs to be built with non-driving citizens in mind.


Right. Like Apple's on-device scanning and reporting, cars could scan and report bad behaviours. Toyotas already can detect when a driver is drowsy based on their driving and prompts them to take a break. How hard would it be to make it call police when the driving is severely impaired?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: