Did you not even read the damn letter I posted? Don't talk to me until you've read that letter. And then go do some research, and tell me how the hell the WTC could have been brought down without the assistance of the high-powered directed-energy weapons that WE ALREADY KNOW EXIST IN LOW_EARTH ORBIT. I'd love to hear your theories, since you say you're so "open-minded". And don't give me any of that bullshit about "high-energetic thermitic devices". You and I both know that's a crap theory. And don't bother telling me that I'm "ridiculous", since I've already heard it a hundred times from the other Jones cohorts who only want their version of the "truth" to be told. READ THE DAMN LETTER!
Then again, if you really are one of "Doctor" Stanley's crew, don't bother even responding to me.
I read the letter you linked to. I'm very confused what you are trying to say to me.
Who is Stanley? I can't fully discern what you are saying about this letter; it sounds like there is some in-fighting between the leaders of a website that was publishing articles about 911 demolition theories. What does this have to do with our debate?
I don't know if you are serious about this directed-energy weapon. I think there is more credibility to the thermate theory, but I don't really know the details of space-based weapons. It sounds like science fiction.
Maybe I am just wasting my time responding to this. In this discussion I was merely trying to say that there are valid questions that have been raised about the official 9/11 story. Why are people so inclined to dismiss any such qeustioning as ludicrous?
No sir, YOU are the one dismissing the views of others as ludicrous. Just like the rest of the Jones cabal, you expect everyone to accept an overwrought orchestration of crashing planes and sulfurized aluminothermic incendiaries. First of all, everyone already knows that THERE WERE NO AIR PLANES! The video footage was obviously doctored:
Secondly, no amount of "debate" can explain away the deficiencies of even the most energetic barium-nitrate-enhanced nano-engineered thermitic demolition incendiaries, whose detonation velocities are not even CLOSE to the DV needed to incise concrete and steel structural members. It's obvious to anyone who understands exothermic chemistry that some fancy little thermite fireworks did NOT bring down TWO 500,000 ton state-of-the-art skyscrapers.
No, we both know there are only two things that could bring down those buildings in a convincing manner: 1. Low-yield, high-efficiency nuclear weapons, and 2.) high-powered, tightly focused directed energy weapons.
Are you seriously going to suggest that you KNOW FOR SURE that both these weapons were ENTIRELY developed by humans? Seriously?! Is it just a coincidence that both of them were developed in the massive off-limits-to-the-public military facilities at Groom lake, Tonopah, and the NTS, where there have been MANY proven UFO sightings over the past 50 years? Now who's being ludicrous. Open your eyes man -- don't be a conspiracy snob.
Then again, if you really are one of "Doctor" Stanley's crew, don't bother even responding to me.