Not to distract from your point, but in this specific instance I'd probably use ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		bewuethr on Aug 25, 2021 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: An Introduction to JQ Not to distract from your point, but in this specific instance I'd probably use `map({title, number})` instead `[ .[] \| <something> ]`

paulddraper on Aug 27, 2021 [–]

Side note, but one of the hardest things about jq is to realize all the operators operate on streams of values.

For example, map() operates on a stream of arrays. That kind of doubling of iteration can be confusing at first.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact