See, the trick here is to put all the personal data onto an oddly specific t-shirt that's for sale.
Available now, size "Large" t-shirt for sale!
"I'm a proud dad living in Seattle who attended the University of Washington and once went on a trip to Central America for a while. I have a dog and like to read and occasionally complain about politics."
I'd buy this if I saw it, if just for the lulz and nihilistic outlook when it comes to privacy.
In fact... if I were a privacy-focused company, I'd 100% do this as a marketing stunt.
OMG. This is just brilliant on so many levels. It's not just subversive against FB's rules but also can be the start of some kind of art project as a statement about what tech companies know about us. But the project itself gives us a choice in what is shown to others whereas FB doesn't give us that choice when selling the info to advertisers. It'll probably get shut down real quick by FB though once they know about this.
Edited: as my sibling comment mentioned, I too would buy one of these shirts.
The exploit was that FB put your name in the public response from the Graph API. I remember discovering that, saying that might be abusable, and moved on with my life.
About a year later, I started getting oddly specific t-shirts like all <last names> do <x good>.
Even without seeing the result, it was entirely predictable what was going to happen when someone let a computer generate phrases from word lists. The guy who went out of business generated 700 different combos algorithmically and then did not proofread them. That seems absurd. 700 isn't really that many, a few hours of manual labor to cull the bad ones, and his business may have made money.
I think other people have made money successfully with the few hours of manual labor version. At least, I think I've seen their customized products continue to exist and be available...
700 "Keep Calm and ___" shirts, they also generated 22 million "___ a ___ who ___ and __ " style ones for their catalog and listed 550k of them on Amazon.
All of the examples shown in the article were of the "keep calm and ___" variety. With 550K more in the catalog, I imagine there were plenty of wild ones.
Even better: phrase it in relation to the person reading the shirt, not the person wearing it:
"You are seeing this shirt because [advertiser] wants to reach people who are friends with individuals who are [age], interested in [topic], located in or near [city], who wear [size] shirts.
As someone else pointed out, personal attributes are prohibited from ads.
My feeling is, communicating a compelling data collection story, even strictly positivist things like how much data is collected, let alone normative ones like we should collect less data or prohibit collecting it - you're not going to tell that story with some neat hack inside the system.
You can get very close, I had an ad on Facebook the other day with transliterations of hindi/urdu words on it. When I clicked to see why, Facebook thought I was interested in a Pakistani newspaper (I think I'd read some articles on it on my phone, I guess the trackers picked that up). I guarantee you 99% of readers of the newspaper where I am (or probably anywhere) are of Pakistani descent. The ad wasn't telling me my race/national origin, but it was clear Facebook knew.
I remember seeing a t-shirt ad that said something along the lines of "March people are X"... and I'm born in March. It just made me that I contributed to Zuck's data hoard.
Considering this is the top post on HN, it's only a matter of time before someone offers these for sale and has a Show HN post about it. I just hope they have a coupon code for HNers!
I wonder if this tactics could be used to increase click rate. Sound like a good idea to grab someones attention and maybe reduce spending by targeting niches.
As a FB marketing expert, this wouldn't work. Yes we could target you, but the market is too small and not worth the effort. The minimum audience worth targeting
Available now, size "Large" t-shirt for sale!
"I'm a proud dad living in Seattle who attended the University of Washington and once went on a trip to Central America for a while. I have a dog and like to read and occasionally complain about politics."
I'd buy this if I saw it, if just for the lulz and nihilistic outlook when it comes to privacy.
In fact... if I were a privacy-focused company, I'd 100% do this as a marketing stunt.