Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The story is unproven nonsense. The burden of proof lies with the accuser and it has never been met in the first place.


That doesn't really apply when theres a bunch of dick pics on an ACTUAL COMPUTER EVERYONE REFUSES TO LOOK AT. Jesus just check the saved wifi network passwords....if Hunter Biden's house network is saved on it, safe to say it's his laptop. Instead ppl like you unintelligently refer to it as "unproven nonsense" and bury your head in the sand.


I don't have access to the computer nor the raw data. I was underwhelmed by the original news article and never saw anything that changed my mind thereafter. I'm not refusing too look at a computer nobody has access to.

Maybe they ought to have leaked the raw data for me to look at.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: