Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> you would lock down and provide income/food/capabilities for people to live regardless of their social/economic status.

You are mistaking democracy with other virtues. income/food/capabilities do not come from thin air, it is eventually generated by people and under lockdowns when most economy is at a standstill this is incredibly difficult. So even the "redistribution" does not work that well. India is also a far poorer country so there is not much to distribute in first place.

> locking down isn't why poor people hurt, locking down and doing nothing to feed them does.

What we need is some humility that we do not fully understand what others need and the only way to find it out is by giving people freedom. Poor people in India right now do not want anyone's alms. They are more interested into going out, doing what they want to do rather than just get food clothing and shelter. The previous lockdown did ensure that everyone had food clothing and shelter through government and private charity efforts but people were in general pretty upset.

I think we should stop assigning blame to democracy just because realities don't match up our expectations, partly because we are not infinitely smart to understand what other people want.



I think it's safe to assume if you're missing anything from the base of Maslow's hierarchy then those things are probably included in what you immediately need, let alone what you want.


This to me just reads as excuses based on how it is, not how it could have been.

Learned helplessness is what they call it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: