Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

One word: Financialization.

The 70s started the trend of financializing (is that the word?) everything, that meant that at every step of every productive process someone packaged it into a tradable "paper", which got packaged with other paper from other productive processes and then re-sold and repackaged again and again to the market as proxies of the value from those productive processes.

Holding paper assets turned out to be much more lucrative than the actual production for most companies, not to mention far far easier than competing in the market with products and innovation, so naturally it slowly began to chip away at the quality of the production in favor of holding paper that represented production. Outsourcing became possible and they noticed it didn't matter to the ones buying the paper assets who actually did the work, so it skyrocketed.

Financialization required an immeasurable amount of debt, they began extending credit to anyone so they could buy said paper, and then turned around and made the debt itself financial paper.

That got us the stock market booms of the 80s, the 90s, the dot com, the financial crisis, and of course their busts.

Now we are at the end, and the signal? companies are adding bitcoin to their balance sheets. The cycle of finacialization is complete, paper is no longer required and you don't even have to outsource your production, not that you have it anyways, as all you need to post profits and pretend you are a good CEO is buy crypto and hodl.

Production for a 'modern' business is rapidly becoming a thing of the past. Governments can try to buy their way into any market but it is useless; most businesses have no real capacity to compete delivering cutting edge products with actual real "bare-metal" profitable businesses because they can only make profits "on paper".

(sorry if finacialization is not how it's written)



Doom doom money doom doom. Nonsense.

Top 10 companies

https://fxssi.com/top-10-most-valuable-companies-in-the-worl...

Most of these are providing goods and services that 100s millions of people are getting value from, with the possible exception of Facebook :p

As an aside I must admit I had never heard of Delta Electronics before at all; nearly 50 years old and 5th most valuable company.

Out of the top 10 you do get some pure play financial companies like Berkshire, Morgan Chase, Visa (maybe).

Cutting edge semi conductor manufacture is arguably some of the most advanced technology and manufacturing we do at scale. It's just plain hard hard. The equipment, the expertise, the lead time to manufacture, it's all big scale problems.

Relatively speaking getting manufacturing of old node sizes would like not be remotely as hard, 32nm maybe even 16nm.


Those companies, maybe with the exception of Facebook and Microsoft, are literally only possible because of paper money. Take out the paper they hold from their balance sheets and their size goes down in half. Take away their ability to own their markets by issuing debt bonds, which would mean competing with the revenue generated by their own products, and you kill them.

Apple became the biggest company in the world not only because they create products everyone wants, but equally because they are masters at managing money and debt. That is what gives them the edge in production as they barely produce anything. They are probably the best at managing financial assets by far.

And Tesla, well Tesla is very bad at building cars, they are bankrupt without paper profits. They shouldn’t be on that list.

Semiconductors is not harder than any other cutting edge industry that has come before. Taiwan is not special, they are 20 million people. A good chunk of them trained and educated in the US.


Also note that as far as hardware production is concerned, Tesla is the only company on that list that actually manufacturers anything at scale in the US anymore.


> Apple became the biggest company in the world not only because they create products everyone wants, but equally because they are masters at managing money and debt.

What, by not having any? The correct amount of cash for a company to have is $0 because it's not a productive asset, as you say, but Apple's strategy ended up with them having hundreds of billions of it overseas. That is literally the opposite of MBA philosophy, not an even better version of it.

(And they own a factory in Ireland.)


> That is literally the opposite of MBA philosophy, not an even better version of it.

Who said anything about MBAs? The Apple way is clearly the better way to do it at the moment, and has been for the last decade. The MBAs at Intel are not even in the same league.

And Apple owns factories in the US too. They own them for other reasons, not because they "need" them to make products or are profitable on their own.


That list is wildly incorrect. Delta Electronics doesn't have anything remotely close to a 1.4T USD market cap.


> Now we are at the end, and the signal? companies are adding bitcoin to their balance sheets. The cycle of finacialization is complete, paper is no longer required and you don't even have to outsource your production, not that you have it anyways, as all you need to post profits and pretend you are a good CEO is buy crypto and hodl.

This literally isn't possible because of how GAAP accounting rules work for bitcoin. You can't count the value going up if you hold, but you have to mark it down if it goes down. It's only bad for you.


You don't need to report it to the SEC for the market to "get wink wink" your bitcoin holdings went up.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: