Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This should be the follow up study. Are there higher rates of higher state cancer in America and do they correlate with access to health insurance?


I think people are waiting too long. And hospitals are probably not unhappy with that. I bet there is way more money in late stage cancer treatments vs early stage.


When your system would rather make money from your treatment of stage 4 cancer than benefit from a healthy and cured stage 1 cancer survivor.

I’m happy my taxes go towards helping people get out of stage 1 than seeing people live their final days in stage 4.


Exactly, that's one reason why government paid social health care is aligned with this: The government benefits from doing prevention programmes as it is cheaper than late treatment.

Germany had all kind of preventative help/medicine when I lived there.


Why would a private insurer not have the same incentive? Collect full premiums, but overall lower costs with early detection and treatment?


The older and sicker patients tend to move from the private insurer's risk pool to the public one.


Agreed. But there is still an incentive for private insurers to limit future costs.


The US system hopes that people get untreatable stage 4 cancer and die quickly.


Maybe the insurers. Hospitals prefer treating them in the most expensive way.


Heard the Chair of the Department of Medicine at UCSF say they make most of their money on elective procedures.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: