More than 90 million people have been administered the vaccines.
You are using the wrong denominator.
Deaths reported as adverse events aren't necessarily due to the vaccine (they may be reported simply because they happen after administration of the vaccine).
The vaccines do not gene edit (this is what 'gene therapy' implies).
Like I said, you are confused in multiple ways and should stop.
> I did not use a denominator. It was the CDC. Do you have a problem with their methodology?
"Deaths reported as adverse events aren't necessarily due to the vaccine (they may be reported simply because they happen after administration of the vaccine)."
> You repeated what I said, but omitted a part. This distinction is not made (and cannot be made most of the time) with COVID-19. It's therefore an equivalent comparison. Well, as long as you compare it to mortality rate on population rather than infected that is (0.23% is for infected).
"The vaccines do not gene edit (this is what 'gene therapy' implies)."
> I'm not even sure why you are so annoyed by gene therapy. It plays no part in my argument. If you don't like gene therapy, then call it new vaccination method X. It's weird how people are alarmed by the moniker "gene therapy", but do it anyway if you don't call it like that.
"Like I said, you are confused in multiple ways and should stop. "
> You said I spread misinformation while using CDC and WHO. That was clearly not correct. Direct your anger at my argument and not at me please; maybe you see the futility of your anger then.
You are using the wrong denominator.
Deaths reported as adverse events aren't necessarily due to the vaccine (they may be reported simply because they happen after administration of the vaccine).
The vaccines do not gene edit (this is what 'gene therapy' implies).
Like I said, you are confused in multiple ways and should stop.