And is it just me or does this part mean absolutely nothing:
> We promise that we will not enforce the copyleft provisions in AGPL v3.0 against you if your application (a) does not
link to Focalboard directly, but exclusively uses Focalboard's Admin Tools and Configuration Files, and
(b) you have not modified, added to or adapted the source code of Focalboard in a way that results in the creation of
a “modified version” or “work based on” Focalboard as these terms are defined in the AGPL v3.0 license.
doesn't (a) mean the admintools should not be under the AGPL? i wonder why they couldn't just specify an appropriate license instead.
and does (b) mean that when i host focalboard myself, i would be allowed to hide the fact from my users?
what other benefit is there from not enforcing the AGPL against me?
if the AGPL is in applied to the unmodified version, then my users would get the original source and whether they got it from me or from upstream. so i don't see the benefit of nonenforcement
And is it just me or does this part mean absolutely nothing:
> We promise that we will not enforce the copyleft provisions in AGPL v3.0 against you if your application (a) does not link to Focalboard directly, but exclusively uses Focalboard's Admin Tools and Configuration Files, and (b) you have not modified, added to or adapted the source code of Focalboard in a way that results in the creation of a “modified version” or “work based on” Focalboard as these terms are defined in the AGPL v3.0 license.