You have a different meaning of "guaranteed" and "ubiquitous". It wouldn't be de...

		pwdisswordfish0 on March 16, 2021 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Dennis Ritchie’s first C compiler (c. 1972) You have a different meaning of "guaranteed" and "ubiquitous". It wouldn't be defensible to use those descriptors for Windows XP. In a word, it would be wrong. Calling DOS 3.30 "guaranteed-ubiquitous" is even wronger than that.