The video event annotations or filenames described in the article sound like what you might get out of a company culture that allowed the previous behavior to go largely unpunished.
It was not clear to me if the Arizona prison (the customer) chose those filenames or Verkada did. I could see prison guards doing the same thing... archiving clips that they find entertaining and naming them inappropriately. Not defending Verkada, I just wish the article made the culprit more clear.
> Inside Arizona’s Graham County detention facility, which has 17 cameras, videos are given titles by the center’s staff and saved to a Verkada account.
Even if the CEO is unshameable, the investors can be. Here they are[0]. Remind them publicly they invest in a broken company and make their association toxic as and until they distance, disinvest and hold the company and its officers fully accountable.
I used AdBlockPlus to block their pixel-filter, and then when I went back in they served me this nice message: Access to this page has been denied because we believe you are using automation tools to browse the website.
Javascript is disabled or blocked by an extension (ad blockers for example)
