Git is an implementation detail in the way x86 in the 2000's was an implementation detail. Of course in theory what I'm talking about doesn't have to be git, it could be another extremely well engineered, capable, reliable, trustworthy, auditable, fast, ubiquitous version control system. But in practice that means Git and there is nothing on my forecasts that will come close to dethroning it in the next 10 years.
I have seen 50 startups that have pitched building a shittier version of git for academics because they can't be bothered to spend time reading the internals of git and have no idea how well done it is.
> I have seen 50 startups that have pitched building a shittier version of git for academics because they can't be bothered to spend time reading the internals of git and have no idea how well done it is.
I suspect git would make a fine back end for a more polished product for scientists. A github for scientists sounds very interesting.
I have seen 50 startups that have pitched building a shittier version of git for academics because they can't be bothered to spend time reading the internals of git and have no idea how well done it is.