the irony is that the intern after three years of suffering, twisted the arm of our PI and convinced him to do the right thing and got an 11-page retraction identifying and confirming the source of her artifact. This diligence got her a job at a big pharma company.
Of course her paper should have been a cautionary tale, but there are still people using the flawed technique for high-throughput studies to this day.
Of course her paper should have been a cautionary tale, but there are still people using the flawed technique for high-throughput studies to this day.