Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Wouldn't the opposite be giving to those organizations directly? I'm not opposed to Smile, but presumably it isn't intended to be the only source of funding. Still, like you say, it's better than not giving anything.


The opposite of using Amazon Smile is not using it. It costs you nothing and benefits charities.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: