Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The claims define the protected inventions. In this example, claim 1 recites a very specific way to implement a chat bot.

"A method for creating a conversational chat bot of a specific entity, the method comprising: receiving a request associated with a specific entity; accessing social data associated with the specific entity, the social data comprising at least one of: images of the specific entity, voice data for the specific entity, conversational data associated with the specific entity, and publicly available information about the specific entity; processing the social data using at least one of machine learning techniques and one or more rule sets, wherein processing the social data comprises: identifying conversation data collected for the specific entity; identifying conversation data collected for one or more entities similar to the specific entity; and determining similarities between the one or more entities and the specific entity using at least one of expression analysis techniques, approval indicators, and characteristics comparisons; using the social data to create a personality index, wherein the personality index comprises personality information for the specific entity; and using the personality index to train a chat bot to interact conversationally using the personality information of the specific entity"

Is this really common?



Everything except the personality index step seems like obvious boilerplate for how one would accomplish implementing a chatbot that tries to replicate a particular training corpus.

And not very clear what personality index means in this context.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: