... I agree? It sounds like you believe I'm saying they shouldn't be posted or that wSJ breaks guidelines (of which I've said neither), rather than provide an explanation as to why this may have been chosen over another source?
Sorry, I think I misunderstood you - usually when people post like that they're complaining about such sites or advocating for not allowing them here. (Moderation is pattern matching and a short comment will tend to get matched as the most common pattern in a bucket unless there's enough information to establish otherwise.)
Unlike Reuters, it actually includes a link to the SEC release that the entire article is about.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/sec-approves-nyses-plan-for-new...