The article claims that many cars are declared "salvage" merely due to Tesla's expensive repairs, which they claim is caused by their (unique?) restrictions on parts availability. As such, Tesla would arguably be responsible for the fact that the cars are "salvage" in the first place.
I'm strongly in favor of greater re-use of these enormous machines that require intense capital investment, and valuable and limited resources to create.
> I'm strongly in favor of greater re-use of these enormous machines that require intense capital investment, and valuable and limited resources to create.
Yes, though as long as Tesla is up-front about their restrictions, people can take those considerations into account when they make their capital investment.
I'm strongly in favor of greater re-use of these enormous machines that require intense capital investment, and valuable and limited resources to create.