Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That’s a cumbersome extra step for unclear benefit.

Yes, q is supposedly faster than jq. But it is exceedingly rare for me to ever have any performance problems with jq, especially since it’s essentially a one off utility I use occasionally, not as part of the hot loop of any workflow where performance matters.



In that case I suppose you wouldn't use it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: