No idea why you're being downvoted but this is 100% factually correct in the US: you'll get sued by a company that has a very salaried legal team.
Even if Zoom is in the wrong/has no case, all it takes to "win" in the US is enough of a bankroll to troll someone via the legal system. It's pay-to-play here and Zoom likely has the budget to run an independent researcher into the ground financially with legal defense fees alone.
I get that HN wants to have it's "hacker" ideals and all, but, I would expect to cause myself legal troubles for publishing security details on such a service (unless done anonymously with reasonable opsec).
Even if Zoom is in the wrong/has no case, all it takes to "win" in the US is enough of a bankroll to troll someone via the legal system. It's pay-to-play here and Zoom likely has the budget to run an independent researcher into the ground financially with legal defense fees alone.
I get that HN wants to have it's "hacker" ideals and all, but, I would expect to cause myself legal troubles for publishing security details on such a service (unless done anonymously with reasonable opsec).