Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> The thesis of Guns, Germs, and Steel was Europe's east-west orientation allowed varieties domesticated in one place to easily grow in another.

It's worth noting that despite the east-west orientation of Eurasia, there is quite little evidence of technology and agriculture actually being shared between the Mediterranean and Chinese origins, especially if you restrict yourself to the traditional origin-of-civilization innovations such as agriculture itself, pottery, metallurgy. By contrast, the Americas show a great deal more transmission along its north-south axis, with maize (from Mesoamerica) almost completely supplanting native North American domesticants, pottery appearing to come from the Amazon rainforest, and metallurgy arriving from the Andes.



Didn't a lot of things from Asia come to the Mediterranean to become omnipresent things? E.g. oranges, lemons, rice.

Isn't wheat itself something that spread both ways from the middle East?


Wheat, barley, lentils, peas, chickpeas.

Goats, sheep, pig...

Most of those come from the fertile crescent.


For all intents and purposes, I equate the Fertile Crescent with the Mediterranean world. The big divide I'm talking about is crossing from China across the variety of deserts to reach Mesopotamia and the Mediterranean.


> there is quite little evidence of technology and agriculture actually being shared between the Mediterranean and Chinese origins

You mean apart from (just off the top of my head) gunpowder, paper, the Hindu-Arabic numeral system, stirrups, and pasta/noodles?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: