> "The point was that a government is the entity to protect, enable and allow free speech; a private entity is not."
This is true in the ideal case. In practice, governments don't always enable and protect free speech. Even the idea that governments should do this is fairly recent, and constantly under attack.
> "Google cannot enable free speech in China"
This is true. But Google can warn people when free speech is under attack. And some companies do have a habit of fighting for free speech.
In the end, there is no single entity that can and should bear the entire responsibility of protecting free speech; it's up to everybody.
This is true in the ideal case. In practice, governments don't always enable and protect free speech. Even the idea that governments should do this is fairly recent, and constantly under attack.
> "Google cannot enable free speech in China"
This is true. But Google can warn people when free speech is under attack. And some companies do have a habit of fighting for free speech.
In the end, there is no single entity that can and should bear the entire responsibility of protecting free speech; it's up to everybody.